“Mobility, Law & Citizenship” Workshop, by Véronique Fortin, UC Irvine.
On November 21st 2013, a small group of scholars gathered at lunchtime as six graduate students and one faculty member (Gillian G. Tan, Deakin University, Australia) discussed the challenges of working on migration and mobility. The call for participation for this workshop had invited abstracts of research projects seeking to “widen anthropology’s lens on the range of relationships between legal regimes, citizenship, and human mobility.” The diversity of submissions made for an enriching conversation on topics including “brain drain” and the politics of mobility in Serbia; Congolese refugees in Tanzania and mobile international humanitarian organizations; Mexican H-2B-visa holders planting trees on roadways in the US; the encounter between the members of the Los Angeles Mongolian Association (LAMA), and Los Angeles municipal officials; the traffic in women, plants, and gold through different sites along the Interoceanic Road in Brazil, Peru. and Bolivia; and the contrast between the mobility of the demonstrators and the perceived immobility of homeless people, two criminalized populations in urban public spaces in Montreal. The collegial conversation continued beyond the workshop indicating the success of the workshops in creating new networks of dynamic political and legal anthropology scholars.
Workshop on “Law and Rurality,”
by Michele L. Statz, University of Washington.
Taking “rurality as a continuum” (Pruitt 2006) as its point of departure, the APLA “Law and Rurality” workshop welcomed scholars who explore the shifting parameters, regulation, and significance of rural spaces domestically and abroad. Facilitated by Professors Kathryn Marie Dudley (Yale U) and Daniel Murphy (U Cincinnati), the conversation considered the gendered outcomes of land titling programs in Peru; invocations of rurality in the management of ethically produced high quality handloom cloth in India; negotiated attachments to property, or pai, in agrarian Ukraine; and the creative and localized strategies of public interest immigration attorneys in small U.S. towns. Together, the group explored intersections of law and landscape, temporality, gender and generation in rural contexts (however ambiguously defined), and we interrogated the categorical significance, and even usefulness, of “rurality” itself. As all of the workshop participants are nearing the end of fieldwork or are in the early stages of dissertation write-up, facilitators also offered helpful guidance about the practicalities and poetics of ethnography. This portion of the workshop covered everything from literary aesthetics to work-life balance, and the personal reflections and professional strategies Dudley and Murphy shared were invaluable to students who admitted to feeling somewhat “adrift” in the isolation of fieldwork and writing. Given the breadth and relevance of the topics discussed, as well as the overall warmth and collegiality of the conversation, APLA’s aim of supporting future legal anthropologists was certainly met in this workshop!